Blog Entry #6 Learning vs. Acquisition
When discussing learning vs. acquisition styles of learning
it seems like one has to make a definitive stand on one side of the fence. This reminds me of our last class where
we wrote a persuasive piece about authentic
vs. formulaic writing. Again, I find
myself not able to commit to one side. I
strongly believe that the acquisition model is my “go-to” view, however, there
are times when I would also use the learned approach. I would not require students to look up words
in the dictionary to write definitions for content area study but I would
preteach some vocabulary words. And, I
might uses a variety of worksheets (D.L.I. for example) to teach parts of
speech, i.e. adjectives, verbs, now, however, I would also extend that activity
by having students identify words in their own writing or in books they are
reading. As I review my selections on
p. 48 of our Essential Linguistics text, I find that there were several places
where the choice included both learning and acquisition styles. For example, make alphabet books on different
topics. This is clearly a teacher directed activity, however, there is also the
choice in topics. Also, the phrase that
says the teacher makes sure that students read only books that fit their level
still offers choice.
What struck me after doing this activity was the realization
that there is a degree of comfort in learning/word recognition as it is more
concrete and is easier to measure, however, when it comes right down to best
practices, I can easily chose acquisition as the more long lasting learning of
the two.
After close examination of these two views and when planning
lessons for my class, I will develop my activities using the acquisition lense
knowing that the process is more important than the product.